“What then? Are we better than they?”
The full verse · Romans 3:9 · KJV
? are we than they? , in no : we have before , that they ;
Asked by
Paul: the apostle to the Gentiles, a Jew himself, speaking for his fellow Jews with "we" (Romans 1:1; 3:9)
Asked to
Romans: the believers in Rome, called to be saints (Romans 1:7), here following Paul's argument about the Jew's advantage (Romans 3:1-2)
The Scene
Paul has answered objections about God's faithfulness and justice (Romans 3:3-8) and now sums up his case about Jews and Gentiles.
Why It Was Asked
The purpose behind the questionPaul had said the Jews had "much every way" of advantage, chiefly the oracles of God (Romans 3:2). A reader might conclude that Jews stood better before God. Paul asks the question to correct that. "What then?" gathers up the argument; "Are we better than they?" asks whether Jews are in a better position than Gentiles. Barnes explains that the question refers to justification before God, where the Jews had "no preference or advantage over the Gentiles." In the first of two readings he offers, Matthew Henry puts it in the Jew's own voice: "Does this recommend us to God, or will this justify us? No, by no means."
The Response
What Scripture recordsPaul answers at once: "No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin" (Romans 3:9). He then strings together Old Testament verses, beginning, "There is none righteous, no, not one" (Romans 3:10-18). He concludes that "every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God" (Romans 3:19).
Historical Context
The world behind the words"We" here means Paul and his fellow Jews. The verb translated "are we better" is proechometha, which the interlinear glosses "are we better." The phrase "we have before proved" translates proetiasametha, "we have already charged." Barnes points back to the proof in Romans 1:21-32 (the Gentiles) and Romans 2 (the Jews).
To be "under sin" means, as Gill puts it, "under the power and guilt of sin."
The Bigger Picture
Where this fits in God's storyThis question levels the ground. Israel had real privileges: God's word, His covenants, His promises (Romans 3:2; 9:4). But privileges do not make anyone righteous. Barnes is careful to say the question concerns "the great point in debate, to wit, about justification before God." Paul is not taking back what he said in Romans 3:2.
Once every mouth is stopped (Romans 3:19), Paul can announce the good news: "the righteousness of God without the law is manifested" (Romans 3:21), "unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference" (Romans 3:22). The same "all" who are under sin are offered the same grace.
Look Closer
Does Romans 3:9 cancel the advantages Paul named in Romans 3:2?
Carry the question into prayer and conversation.
Lord, what privileges or good things in my life have I quietly trusted to make me right with You?
A prayer to carry into the day.
- What kinds of backgrounds or advantages do people today assume make them better before God?
- How does knowing that everyone stands "under sin" change the way you see people who are very different from you?
For you, a small group, a friend, or the dinner table.
Good things you have received, a Christian home, Bible knowledge, a church, are real gifts. Paul honors them (Romans 3:2). But none of them can make you right with God. On that question, everyone stands on level ground.
That is humbling, and it is freeing. You have no reason to look down on anyone, and no one is too far gone. The same chapter says there is "no difference": all have sinned, and all may be "justified freely by his grace" (Romans 3:22-24).
Built from the biblical text and checked against trusted commentaries and lexicons. References & Sources
Keep questioning
“What advantage then hath the Jew? Or what profit is there of circumcision?”
“Is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles?”
“Thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonourest thou God?”
“Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also?”