Back to database
1817 / 2430
New TestamentMark 14:63Gospels
“What need we any further witnesses?”

The full verse · Mark 14:63 · KJV

the high , and , any ?

Asked by

Caiaphas

Caiaphas: the high priest (named in Matthew 26:57), who rent his clothes after Jesus answered, "I am" (Mark 14:62-63)

Asked to

Sanhedrin

Sanhedrin: "all the council," the chief priests, elders, and scribes assembled with the high priest, who had sought witness against Jesus to put Him to death (Mark 14:53, 55)

The Scene

Jesus has just answered "I am" and spoken of the Son of man at the right hand of power, and the high priest tears his clothes before the council (Mark 14:62-63).

Why It Was Asked

The high priest treated Jesus' answer as blasphemy, so he declared that no more witnesses were needed. Gill says he tore his clothes "as was usual upon hearing blasphemy; which he now supposed the case, or at least would have it so thought." His question means, in Gill's words, why "trouble ourselves to see for any more." After the witnesses had failed (Mark 14:55-59), he now had what he wanted from Jesus' own mouth. Barnes explains how the council saw it: Jesus had, "under oath, arrogated to himself what belongs to God."

The Response

The high priest answered his own question: "Ye have heard the blasphemy: what think ye?" The council agreed: "they all condemned him to be guilty of death" (Mark 14:64). Then "some began to spit on him, and to cover his face, and to buffet him, and to say unto him, Prophesy: and the servants did strike him with the palms of their hands" (Mark 14:65). Luke records the council at daybreak saying, "What need we any further witness? for we ourselves have heard of his own mouth" (Luke 22:66, 71).

Historical Context

Tearing one's clothes was a public sign of grief or horror. Barnes explains, "The Jews were accustomed to rend their clothes, as a token of grief. This was done often as a matter of form, and consisted in tearing a particular part of the garment reserved for this purpose." Gill says the high priest did it to show "his zeal for the honour and glory of God" and his horror at what he called blasphemy.

Mark's word for "clothes" here is chiton, which Thayer defines as "a tunic, an undergarment, usually worn next the skin."

The Bigger Picture

The council had searched for witnesses and could not find testimony that agreed (Mark 14:55-59). In the end, they condemned Jesus for the one thing He said plainly: who He is. Barnes explains their reasoning: "They assumed that he was an impostor; and that point being assumed, everything like a pretension to being the Messiah was, in their view, proof that he deserved to die."

The high priest was right that no more witnesses were needed, but not in the way he meant. Jesus had borne witness to Himself (Mark 14:62). The question was never whether there was enough evidence, but whether they would believe Him.

Look Closer

1 of 3

Why did the high priest say no more witnesses were needed?

Your Turn to Ask

Carry the question into prayer and conversation.

Ask God
Lord, where might I be closing my mind too quickly when Jesus' words challenge what I already believe?

A prayer to carry into the day.

Ask Yourself and Others
  1. The high priest had decided what Jesus was before he heard Him. Where are you tempted to settle a question before you have really listened?
  2. Tell about a time you changed your mind about something Jesus said. What opened your heart to it?

For you, a small group, a friend, or the dinner table.

For Your Life Today

A strong religious reaction is not the same as hearing God. The high priest tore his clothes in a show of zeal, yet he condemned the Son of God. Barnes notes that tearing clothes was "often as a matter of form." Outward signs of devotion can hide a closed heart.

When Jesus says something that unsettles you, slow down. Ask whether you are reacting to protect what you already believe or listening to learn.

This doesn't mean strong feelings about God's honor are wrong. Zeal for God is good when it rests on the truth. The high priest's problem was not that he cared about blasphemy, but that he would not consider that Jesus was telling the truth.

Built from the biblical text and checked against trusted commentaries and lexicons. References & Sources